plastic beads as birth control? how Janet missed the mark
The Ugandan birth control system desperately needs a revision. Uganda is currently the fastest-growing country in the world, with a population that could exceed that of Russia or Japan by 2050. This population explosion threatens to permanently mire the nation in poverty, increasing conflicts over land and resources in an already unstable environment. One half of all pregnancies in Uganda are unintended, and one in four results in an abortion — almost twice the abortion rate in East Africa as a whole.
Over one third of all women have expressed their desire for contraception, but only one in five married women actually has access to it. Oral contraceptives cost approximately 8 cents per month — a price affordable for much of the Uganda population — but clinics are few and generally inaccessible, making this option unavailable to most women. Condoms are theoretically free — to men only — in clinics, but they are often poorly stored, causing them to expire before they can be distributed. In 2004 the government recalled all free health clinic condoms, citing concerns about their quality. The condoms were checked and determined to be fine, but the government did not redistribute them, causing a shortage that has raised prices for the remaining stock to nearly 20 cents per condom.
Though Mrs. Museveni’s plan recognizes the need for better family planning in Uganda, it is sorely misguided. The natural family planning method is intended for monogamous couples and requires the women to carefully observe her periods for three to six months before implementing the system (the Moon Beads are intended to be used immediately and do not account for varying menstrual cycles). Even then, the method is only 75-90% effective, as compared to 95-99% for oral contraceptives and 86-98% for condoms.
Furthermore, the reality is that over 25% of men and 13% of women in Uganda admit to having sex with more than one partner (this does not include rape statistics, which are especially high in the north). Moon Beads and other methods of natural family planning do nothing to prevent the spread of HIV and other STDs. What Uganda needs if it is to avoid unwanted pregnancies, further lower the prevalence of AIDS, curb its wild population growth and prevent the medical complications that over 80,000 women face each year as a result of abortions is not a string of colored beads but better access to both information about birth control methods and to the methods themselves. Instead of encouraging women to use a method that is often ineffective and can contribute to the spread of disease, Mrs. Museveni should campaign to open more clinics throughout the country and to make both condoms and oral contraceptives widely and easily available to women.
Labels: aid and development, public health, u.s. politics, ugandan politics, women
1 Comments:
@Jackfruity-your article is an interesting critique of the moonbeads initiative however you should note that this is only one in a variety of campaigns aimed at reaching different people by the Uganda Health Marketing group along with abstinence campaigns focussed on youth, faithfulness campaigns focussed on couples, and contraceptive campaigns for women-including the pill(which i also agree need to have more funding for hspitals e.t.c)
but this moonbeads campaign caters to a wide group of people:
those women who are religious and will not use contraceptives because the church opposes them
those women who are pessimistic about long term drug use-and rightly so-there are constantly law suits involving some birth control drug effects
those women who bodies are not hormone friendly-side effects e.t.c
i realise its a small step forward-but it helps women understand how their bodies work and when its risky and when its not.I have found it a great teaching tool for schools too...
I have had women confess that it has been easier to get thier monogamous partners to use condoms/abstain while on the moonbeads because they knew it was only "seasonal"
I do agree much more should be done to improve on the state of the healthcare-but should we cut down one tree jsut so that we can palnt another?
a Ugandan moonbeader :-)